Margin Protection Program in Monroe County, Wisconsin, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 133
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in Monroe County, Wisconsin totaled $152,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $53,299 |
| 2 | Ridgeville Holsteins Too LLC | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $22,375 |
| 3 | Brueggen Dairy Farm Inc | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $21,783 |
| 4 | Brandau Village View Farms LLC | Wilton, WI 54670 | $21,180 |
| 5 | Mlsna East Town Dairy LLC | Cashton, WI 54619 | $8,021 |
| 6 | David L Prielipp | Tomah, WI 54660 | $3,820 |
| 7 | Schmitz Family Dairy Inc | Cashton, WI 54619 | $600 |
| 8 | Mapltwin Farms LLC | Cashton, WI 54619 | $592 |
| 9 | Herricks Dairy Farm Inc | Cashton, WI 54619 | $588 |
| 10 | Hall Dairy Farms LLC | Tomah, WI 54660 | $584 |
| 11 | Brandau Hilltop Holsteins, LLC | Wilton, WI 54670 | $581 |
| 12 | Wedemeier Farms LLC | Tomah, WI 54660 | $577 |
| 13 | Coulee Crest LLC | Cashton, WI 54619 | $575 |
| 14 | Hawk High Dairy LLC | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $559 |
| 15 | Flock Farms LLC | Rockland, WI 54653 | $558 |
| 16 | Mahogany Dairy LLC | Rockland, WI 54653 | $556 |
| 17 | Spring Valley Holsteins Inc | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $543 |
| 18 | Larry F Hall | Tomah, WI 54660 | $438 |
| 19 | James L Weiker | Cashton, WI 54619 | $437 |
| 20 | Ridge Vu Dairy LLC | Wilton, WI 54670 | $432 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf