Total Commodity Programs in Monroe County, Wisconsin, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 585
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Monroe County, Wisconsin totaled $6,387,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $275,375 |
2 | Mlsna Dairy Supply Inc | Cashton, WI 54619 | $217,356 |
3 | Chapman Farms Dairy LLC | Tomah, WI 54660 | $146,321 |
4 | Valley Corp | Tomah, WI 54660 | $124,990 |
5 | Darrick T Johnson | Tomah, WI 54660 | $121,958 |
6 | Ridgeville Holsteins Too LLC | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $96,576 |
7 | North Tomah Cranberry Co Inc | Tomah, WI 54660 | $87,113 |
8 | Brueggen Dairy Farm Inc | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $87,012 |
9 | Herricks Dairy Farm Inc | Cashton, WI 54619 | $85,592 |
10 | Michael J Linnehan | Sparta, WI 54656 | $85,076 |
11 | Hawk High Dairy LLC | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $79,193 |
12 | Wildcat Bluff Cranberry Company L | Eau Claire, WI 54701 | $77,814 |
13 | Prehn Cranberry Co | Wausau, WI 54403 | $75,656 |
14 | Mapltwin Farms LLC | Cashton, WI 54619 | $74,452 |
15 | Douglas A Fries | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $73,233 |
16 | Jensen Cranberry Bogs Inc | Warrens, WI 54666 | $69,819 |
17 | Spring Valley Holsteins Inc | Norwalk, WI 54648 | $69,748 |
18 | Baileys Cherry Valley Dairy LLC | Tomah, WI 54660 | $63,766 |
19 | Hall Dairy Farms LLC | Tomah, WI 54660 | $61,331 |
20 | James Potter Cranberry Marsh Inc | Warrens, WI 54666 | $59,478 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>