Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Outagamie County, Wisconsin, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 285
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Outagamie County, Wisconsin totaled $93,786 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oneida Nation | Seymour, WI 54165 | $6,318 |
| 2 | Clm Farms LLC | Bear Creek, WI 54922 | $6,111 |
| 3 | Kurey Brothers Llp | Appleton, WI 54913 | $3,886 |
| 4 | Tinedale Cropping | Wrightstown, WI 54180 | $3,652 |
| 5 | Steinacker Farms Inc | Hortonville, WI 54944 | $3,413 |
| 6 | Moeller Farms LLC | Black Creek, WI 54106 | $2,942 |
| 7 | Paul N Keune | Seymour, WI 54165 | $2,888 |
| 8 | Jeff Schroth Family Farm LLC | Shiocton, WI 54170 | $1,805 |
| 9 | Ryan F Martin | New London, WI 54961 | $1,758 |
| 10 | Van Wychen Farms LLC | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $1,245 |
| 11 | David A Mueller | Seymour, WI 54165 | $1,227 |
| 12 | Verhasselt Farms Ltd | Kaukauna, WI 54130 | $1,193 |
| 13 | Cyril R Roffers | Seymour, WI 54165 | $1,111 |
| 14 | Daniel Raymond Diederich | De Pere, WI 54115 | $1,056 |
| 15 | Raymond Leo Diederich | De Pere, WI 54115 | $1,056 |
| 16 | Schuh View Dairy LLC | Freedom, WI 54130 | $1,035 |
| 17 | Mark Dale Schmidt | Shiocton, WI 54170 | $1,034 |
| 18 | Gary Lee Handrich | New London, WI 54961 | $887 |
| 19 | Allen D Vande Hei | Seymour, WI 54165 | $853 |
| 20 | Vandenberg Farms LLC | Freedom, WI 54130 | $805 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf