Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Pierce County, Wisconsin, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 468
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Pierce County, Wisconsin totaled $8,306,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Son-bow Farms Inc | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $437,286 |
2 | Fetzer Farms Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $399,009 |
3 | Robert L Siewert | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $250,000 |
4 | Steven A Brand | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $250,000 |
5 | Benitz Farms LLC | Maiden Rock, WI 54750 | $196,276 |
6 | Trim Bel Valley Dairy | Beldenville, WI 54003 | $175,740 |
7 | Peterson Family Dairy Inc | River Falls, WI 54022 | $169,620 |
8 | F & F Farms LLC | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $136,401 |
9 | Maple Grove Dairy Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $132,775 |
10 | Schroeder Family Farms Inc | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $121,741 |
11 | John L Skogen | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $120,699 |
12 | A-team | Bay City, WI 54723 | $114,601 |
13 | Geraets Farms LLC | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $104,295 |
14 | Nathan J Sears | Ellsworth, WI 54011 | $93,127 |
15 | Charles Most Farms Inc | Prescott, WI 54021 | $92,573 |
16 | Ti-shi Dairy Inc | Elmwood, WI 54740 | $88,826 |
17 | Wallace R Franta | Spring Valley, WI 54767 | $84,554 |
18 | Holst Farms Inc | Prescott, WI 54021 | $83,767 |
19 | Double N Farms LLC | Plum City, WI 54761 | $81,491 |
20 | Prairie View Farms Inc | Hager City, WI 54014 | $75,512 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>