Counter Cyclical Program in Portage County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 685
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Portage County, Wisconsin totaled $3,123,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | James Burns & Sons Farms Inc | Almond, WI 54909 | $130,000 |
2 | Gordondale Farms | Nelsonville, WI 54458 | $92,536 |
3 | Helbach Farms LLC | Amherst, WI 54406 | $83,940 |
4 | Wysocki Produce Farm Inc | Bancroft, WI 54921 | $68,298 |
5 | Heartland Farms Inc | Hancock, WI 54943 | $58,249 |
6 | Blue Top Farms | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $45,896 |
7 | Wendell Krogwold & Son | Amherst Junction, WI 54407 | $44,030 |
8 | Prairie Star Ranch Inc | Plover, WI 54467 | $36,679 |
9 | Bacon Farms Amherst Inc | Amherst, WI 54406 | $36,068 |
10 | Gagas Farms Inc | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $33,460 |
11 | Kizewski Farms Inc | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $32,334 |
12 | Robert J Biadasz | Amherst, WI 54406 | $30,338 |
13 | Golden Acres | Junction City, WI 54443 | $27,762 |
14 | Turzinski Poultry Farms Inc | Almond, WI 54909 | $26,739 |
15 | John J Kuffel | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $24,947 |
16 | Myron Soik & Sons Inc | Stevens Point, WI 54482 | $23,517 |
17 | Laverne J Lepak | Custer, WI 54423 | $23,050 |
18 | Patoka Farms LLC | Amherst, WI 54406 | $21,917 |
19 | Michael Lee Roby | Plainfield, WI 54966 | $21,751 |
20 | Michael J Roby | Plainfield, WI 54966 | $21,751 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>