Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Racine County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 181 to 200 of 243
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Racine County, Wisconsin totaled $7,516,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
181 | Jeff Busch | Burlington, WI 53105 | $3,268 |
182 | Scott J Kastenson | Franksville, WI 53126 | $3,161 |
183 | Robert Lui | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $3,059 |
184 | Carl Johnson | Waterford, WI 53185 | $3,054 |
185 | Edward Malek And Theresa Malek Re | New Berlin, WI 53151 | $2,866 |
186 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,819 |
187 | David E Ball | East Troy, WI 53120 | $2,775 |
188 | Taffilyn M Milam | Waterford, WI 53185 | $2,770 |
189 | Michael Roszina | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $2,701 |
190 | Brian Hager | Franksville, WI 53126 | $2,539 |
191 | John M Vos | Burlington, WI 53105 | $2,445 |
192 | Gail Lois Hack | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $2,421 |
193 | Frances Mainus | Waterford, WI 53185 | $2,346 |
194 | Andrew S Winski | Waterford, WI 53185 | $2,317 |
195 | Jill Jacobs | Waterford, WI 53185 | $2,309 |
196 | Janet M Buckner | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $2,269 |
197 | Wind Lake Turf Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $2,260 |
198 | Robert Olley | Franksville, WI 53126 | $2,253 |
199 | Chad Henderson | East Troy, WI 53120 | $2,248 |
200 | John Martin Vos | Burlington, WI 53105 | $2,228 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”