Counter Cyclical Program in Racine County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 293
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Racine County, Wisconsin totaled $2,920,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Noble Grain Farms | Burlington, WI 53105 | $127,649 |
2 | Wilks Brothers | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $125,830 |
3 | Gunderson Grain Farms | Waterford, WI 53185 | $113,222 |
4 | Kuiper Family Farms | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $110,039 |
5 | Ken & Jim Petersen Farms | Caledonia, WI 53108 | $84,240 |
6 | Consolidated Mills Farms Inc | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $77,261 |
7 | Malchine Farms Inc | Waterford, WI 53185 | $70,851 |
8 | Himebauch Farms Llp | East Troy, WI 53120 | $64,048 |
9 | Gorton Farms | Racine, WI 53406 | $55,493 |
10 | Paul Frost | Waterford, WI 53185 | $53,823 |
11 | Ehrhart Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $49,575 |
12 | Robert E Funk Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $48,820 |
13 | Helding Farms Inc | Franksville, WI 53126 | $47,480 |
14 | Steven B Ament | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $45,732 |
15 | Whitley Farms Inc | Union Grove, WI 53182 | $44,461 |
16 | Thomas Greil | Waterford, WI 53185 | $43,875 |
17 | Borzynski Brothers Properties | Franksville, WI 53126 | $42,742 |
18 | Rowntree Farms Inc | Kansasville, WI 53139 | $39,695 |
19 | James M Lange | Muskego, WI 53150 | $39,639 |
20 | Keith M Heineck | Franksville, WI 53126 | $35,155 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>