Margin Protection Program in Sauk County, Wisconsin, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 128
Recipients of Margin Protection Program from farms in Sauk County, Wisconsin totaled $148,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Margin Protection Program 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $25,094 |
| 2 | Branders Dairy Farm LLC | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $22,287 |
| 3 | United Dreams Dairy LLC | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $21,955 |
| 4 | Melvin K Lohr | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $18,062 |
| 5 | Markley Farms Inc | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $16,288 |
| 6 | Raschein Farms | North Freedom, WI 53951 | $7,033 |
| 7 | Michael J Turner | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $6,920 |
| 8 | Gregory K Lohr | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $1,154 |
| 9 | Kinnamon Ridge Dairy LLC | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $693 |
| 10 | Enge Farms Inc | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $639 |
| 11 | Joe Meyer & Sons LLC | Reedsburg, WI 53959 | $618 |
| 12 | Griesen Family Dairy LLC | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $613 |
| 13 | Roecker's Rolling Acres LLC | Loganville, WI 53943 | $609 |
| 14 | Hickory Ridge Holsteins LLC | Wonewoc, WI 53968 | $605 |
| 15 | Greg V Kanable | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $603 |
| 16 | Neuendorf Inc | Prairie Du Sac, WI 53578 | $594 |
| 17 | Gerald Meixelsperger | Spring Green, WI 53588 | $594 |
| 18 | Legendairy Farms LLC | Wonewoc, WI 53968 | $584 |
| 19 | Terry Farms Inc | Baraboo, WI 53913 | $583 |
| 20 | Ryan R Richert | Lyndon Station, WI 53944 | $582 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf