Farm Subsidy information
Waupaca County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Waupaca County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 306
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Waupaca County, Wisconsin totaled $5,376,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Quantum Dairy LLC | Weyauwega, WI 54983 | $497,289 |
2 | Mark H Moen | Iola, WI 54945 | $193,748 |
3 | Jeffrey R Henschel | Manawa, WI 54949 | $70,141 |
4 | Trzebiatowski Pickle Farms LLC | Waupaca, WI 54981 | $61,893 |
5 | Jonely Dairy Farms LLC | Weyauwega, WI 54983 | $61,816 |
6 | Magdanz Dairy LLC | Pine River, WI 54965 | $60,032 |
7 | Brian T Long | Weyauwega, WI 54983 | $47,112 |
8 | Michael P Hamm Dba Hamm Farms | Waupaca, WI 54981 | $44,225 |
9 | Murphy Family Farms | New London, WI 54961 | $42,663 |
10 | Brandon Gene Fay | Almond, WI 54909 | $39,830 |
11 | Roger L Erickson | Iola, WI 54945 | $37,802 |
12 | Leroy Bartel | Manawa, WI 54949 | $37,204 |
13 | Joel Henschel | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $35,975 |
14 | Carda Farms LLC | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $31,816 |
15 | Hintzdale Dairy LLC | Marion, WI 54950 | $29,510 |
16 | Kendell Leroy Zemple | Manawa, WI 54949 | $29,264 |
17 | Double-take Dairy LLC | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $28,551 |
18 | Joshua F Nett | Fremont, WI 54940 | $25,109 |
19 | Matthew Edward Manske | New London, WI 54961 | $24,887 |
20 | Richard Piechowski | Waupaca, WI 54981 | $24,284 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>