Farm Subsidy information
Waupaca County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Waupaca County, Wisconsin, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,680
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Waupaca County, Wisconsin totaled $188,219,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Stuebs Farms | Weyauwega, WI 54983 | $516,498 |
62 | John Joseph Mares | New London, WI 54961 | $511,897 |
63 | Richard Piechowski | Waupaca, WI 54981 | $507,661 |
64 | Ivan Gruetzmacher | New London, WI 54961 | $504,453 |
65 | Mark H Moen | Iola, WI 54945 | $499,712 |
66 | Heiman Heights Inc | Marion, WI 54950 | $496,950 |
67 | Donald Konrad | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $493,236 |
68 | Smith Dairy Farms Inc | Manawa, WI 54949 | $489,306 |
69 | Lynn Jepson | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $476,211 |
70 | Joel Henschel | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $475,627 |
71 | Jonely Dairy Farms LLC | Weyauwega, WI 54983 | $475,185 |
72 | Brooks Dairy Farm | Waupaca, WI 54981 | $472,173 |
73 | Paul Kenneth Kirchner | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $469,007 |
74 | Daniel J Boerst | Manawa, WI 54949 | $452,430 |
75 | Arthur Hallman | Waupaca, WI 54981 | $444,327 |
76 | Tri-k Farms | Fremont, WI 54940 | $432,709 |
77 | Gonzalez Dairy Inc | Weyauwega, WI 54983 | $425,924 |
78 | Paul J Schuelke | New London, WI 54961 | $420,132 |
79 | Steve Stuebs | Weyauwega, WI 54983 | $419,388 |
80 | Carl J Steinbach | Fremont, WI 54940 | $412,844 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”