Farm Subsidy information
Waupaca County, Wisconsin
Total Subsidies in Waupaca County, Wisconsin, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 306
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Waupaca County, Wisconsin totaled $5,376,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Matthew Pomplun | Berlin, WI 54923 | $5,733 |
82 | Daniel Bartell | Bear Creek, WI 54922 | $5,722 |
83 | Millikin's Magnum Opus LLC | Manawa, WI 54949 | $5,618 |
84 | Earl Pomplun | Redgranite, WI 54970 | $5,591 |
85 | Bruce R Lind | Fremont, WI 54940 | $5,469 |
86 | Kurt Douglas Blankschien | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $5,432 |
87 | Stephanie Knauf | Bear Creek, WI 54922 | $5,404 |
88 | North Hill Farm Llp | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $5,129 |
89 | Scott Michael Reetz | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $5,110 |
90 | Paul J Reierson | Iola, WI 54945 | $4,967 |
91 | Bakake Acres LLC | New London, WI 54961 | $4,872 |
92 | Dopp Dairy Domain Inc | Wild Rose, WI 54984 | $4,872 |
93 | Richard K Peterson | Weyauwega, WI 54983 | $4,723 |
94 | Ryan David Lohff | Clintonville, WI 54929 | $4,651 |
95 | Benjamin Wasrud | Iola, WI 54945 | $4,573 |
96 | Heiman Heights Inc | Marion, WI 54950 | $4,559 |
97 | Carl And Paul Landowski Partnership | Scandinavia, WI 54977 | $4,437 |
98 | Cole Allred | Iola, WI 54945 | $4,421 |
99 | Ward L Weiss | Fremont, WI 54940 | $4,167 |
100 | Dr Robert Peterson | Waupaca, WI 54981 | $4,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”