Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Wood County, Wisconsin, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 405

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Wood County, Wisconsin totaled $10,610,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2021
1Tri-star Dairy IncAuburndale, WI 54412$489,311
2Liquid Coin Dairy LLCMilladore, WI 54454$341,664
3Destiny Farms LLCMarshfield, WI 54449$250,000
4Grass Ridge Farm LLCPittsville, WI 54466$225,346
5Schiferl FarmsHewitt, WI 54441$207,671
6Travis Marti Farms LLCVesper, WI 54489$203,201
7Glacial Lake Cranberries IncWisconsin Rapids, WI 54495$201,972
8Heiman Holsteins LLCMarshfield, WI 54449$193,089
9Weiler Dairy LLCMarshfield, WI 54449$188,506
10Gottschalk Cranberry IncWisconsin Rapids, WI 54494$181,973
11Jacob Searls Cranberry CoWisconsin Rapids, WI 54495$176,267
12Wayerski Dairy LLCPittsville, WI 54466$164,328
13Gaynor Cranberry Company IncWisconsin Rapids, WI 54495$160,693
14Cranmoor Cranberry CompanyWisconsin Rapids, WI 54495$153,106
15D & B Sternweis Farms IncMarshfield, WI 54449$147,797
16Wisconsin River Cranberry Co LLCNekoosa, WI 54457$143,437
17Twin Lake Cranberry Co, LLCVesper, WI 54489$140,369
18Whittlesey Cranberry Co IncWisconsin Rapids, WI 54495$130,007
19Gardner Cranberry LLCPittsville, WI 54466$127,500
20Pankratz Farms LLCMarshfield, WI 54449$126,810

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag