Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Wood County, Wisconsin, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 369
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Wood County, Wisconsin totaled $1,480,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gardner Cranberry LLC | Pittsville, WI 54466 | $127,500 |
| 2 | Glacial Lake Cranberries Inc | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $51,929 |
| 3 | Tri-star Dairy Inc | Auburndale, WI 54412 | $44,078 |
| 4 | Gottschalk Cranberry Inc | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54494 | $32,778 |
| 5 | Gaynor Cranberry Company Inc | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $32,627 |
| 6 | Cranmoor Cranberry Company | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $31,363 |
| 7 | Liquid Coin Dairy LLC | Milladore, WI 54454 | $30,405 |
| 8 | Wisconsin River Cranberry Co LLC | Nekoosa, WI 54457 | $25,608 |
| 9 | Arendt Cranberry Co | Nekoosa, WI 54457 | $24,198 |
| 10 | Elm Lake Cranberry Co Inc | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $21,651 |
| 11 | Bennett Cranberry Co Inc | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $21,151 |
| 12 | Potter & Son Inc | Bancroft, WI 54921 | $20,932 |
| 13 | Whittlesey Cranberry Co Inc | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $20,417 |
| 14 | Amundson Cranberry Inc | Babcock, WI 54413 | $19,978 |
| 15 | Destiny Farms LLC | Marshfield, WI 54449 | $18,932 |
| 16 | City Point Cranberries Llp | Wisconsin Rapids, WI 54495 | $17,706 |
| 17 | 6-m Cranberry Co Inc | Tomah, WI 54660 | $16,358 |
| 18 | Weiler Dairy LLC | Marshfield, WI 54449 | $15,552 |
| 19 | Wisconsin Moss Co Inc | Babcock, WI 54413 | $15,528 |
| 20 | Schiferl Farms | Hewitt, WI 54441 | $12,830 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf