Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Wyoming, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,044

Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Wyoming totaled $86,693,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP)
1995-2023
1Sims Sheep Company LLCEvanston, WY 82930$908,033
2Julian Land & LivestockKemmerer, WY 83101$753,915
3Miller Land And Livestock CorporationBig Piney, WY 83113$668,303
4Larson Livestock IncLyman, WY 82937$622,624
5Ring Tail R Cattle Company LLCRawlins, WY 82301$605,309
6Two Bar Sheep Co LLCCraig, CO 81625$546,028
7Child Ranch LLCCokeville, WY 83114$541,137
8Stratton Sheep CompanyShoshoni, WY 82649$516,451
9Arapahoe RanchThermopolis, WY 82443$490,599
10Jeanne M HabeckMoorcroft, WY 82721$472,334
11Jrb LLCSalt Lake City, UT 84158$471,563
12John Peroulis & SonsCraig, CO 81626$468,101
13Iberlin Farm PartnershipGillette, WY 82718$457,091
14Fred Hunzeker & SonsMontpelier, ID 83254$418,213
15W & M Thoman Ranches LLCGreen River, WY 82935$408,171
16Busenitz Land & Cattle IncHulett, WY 82720$404,175
17Banjo Sheep Company LLCSavery, WY 82332$382,890
18Pretty Water LLCRock Springs, WY 82902$379,318
19Vermillion Ranch Limited PartnershipRock Springs, WY 82901$363,630
20Booth Land & LivestockLucerne, CO 80646$351,965

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag