Dairy Programs in Puerto Rico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 203
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $10,373,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jose G Toledo Toledo | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $108,595 |
22 | R Garcia Kpak Dairy Farm LLC | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $107,963 |
23 | Cienaga Dairy LLC | Camuy, PR 00627 | $106,376 |
24 | Vaquerias Emilio Velez Inc | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $100,243 |
25 | Galateo Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $95,362 |
26 | Rio Nuevo Farms Inc | Toa Baja, PR 00951 | $95,333 |
27 | Delgado Peraza Dairy Farm, Inc. | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $93,836 |
28 | Luna Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $92,525 |
29 | Teodoro F Alfonzo Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $92,407 |
30 | Hacienda Toledo Ramos Inc | Moca, PR 00676 | $92,153 |
31 | Las Palmas Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $90,797 |
32 | Omar A Ortega Claudio | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $90,280 |
33 | Empresas Agricolas Aulet Inc | San Juan, PR 00907 | $89,372 |
34 | Carlos Roman Dairy Farm Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $88,716 |
35 | Vaqueria Grj Incorporated | Humacao, PR 00791 | $88,434 |
36 | Ivan F Martinez Torres | Camuy, PR 00627 | $86,153 |
37 | Vaqueria Mi Sueno LLC | Moca, PR 00676 | $84,407 |
38 | Ramon Talavera Mora | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $76,901 |
39 | Vaqueria Ortiz Rodriguez Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $76,700 |
40 | Vaquerias Varela Casablanca Inc. | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $73,321 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”