Dairy Programs in Puerto Rico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 388
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $34,767,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,810,718 |
2 | Vaqueria Lopez Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $919,714 |
3 | Sucn Espinosa Rivera Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $722,663 |
4 | Vaqueria Lopez Rodriguez Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $598,820 |
5 | Jose Luis Rodriguez Robles | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $555,121 |
6 | Lucena Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $458,172 |
7 | Q Development Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $411,932 |
8 | Agricola Ramon Rosa Delgado Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $396,231 |
9 | Adolfo D Garcia Amador | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $378,371 |
10 | Nango Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $367,276 |
11 | Vaqueria Ceiba Del Mar Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $365,688 |
12 | Alberto Del Rio Soto | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $353,669 |
13 | Rio Nuevo Farms Inc | Toa Baja, PR 00951 | $331,025 |
14 | J R Inc | Juncos, PR 00777 | $325,972 |
15 | Jose G Toledo Toledo | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $290,552 |
16 | Hatillo Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $290,424 |
17 | Jose M Talavera Rodriguez | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $269,569 |
18 | Luna Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $269,305 |
19 | E J A Dairy Inc | Cabo Rojo, PR 00623 | $264,392 |
20 | Ivan F Martinez Torres | Camuy, PR 00627 | $254,830 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>