Dairy Programs in Puerto Rico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 215
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $1,151,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Vaqueria Ceiba Del Mar Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $10,452 |
22 | Adolfo D Garcia Amador | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $10,452 |
23 | J R Inc | Juncos, PR 00777 | $10,452 |
24 | Jose Luis Rodriguez Robles | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $10,452 |
25 | Q Development Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $10,452 |
26 | Nango Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $10,452 |
27 | Vaqueria Luis F. Fernandez Perez Inc. | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $10,452 |
28 | Vaqueria Lopez Rodriguez Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $10,452 |
29 | Jose M Talavera Rodriguez | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $10,336 |
30 | Eiramil Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $10,288 |
31 | Edgardo J Mora Jove | Sabana Hoyos, PR 00688 | $10,264 |
32 | Wilfredo Luciano Gonzalez | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $10,107 |
33 | Agricola Ramon Rosa Delgado Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $9,975 |
34 | Jose G Toledo Toledo | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $9,906 |
35 | Vaqueria Pura Brisa Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $9,779 |
36 | Reinaldo Augusto Roman | Isabela, PR 00662 | $9,342 |
37 | Vaquerias Emilio Velez Inc | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $9,271 |
38 | Vaqueria Los Pinos Inc | Moca, PR 00676 | $9,193 |
39 | Bayaney Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $9,037 |
40 | Galateo Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $9,037 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”