Dairy Programs in Puerto Rico, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 193
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $10,694,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | R Garcia Kpak Dairy Farm LLC | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $115,245 |
22 | Agricola Ramon Rosa Delgado Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $115,127 |
23 | Eiramil Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $114,411 |
24 | Jose G Toledo Toledo | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $114,333 |
25 | Oscar Torres De Jesus | Isabela, PR 00662 | $110,288 |
26 | Empresas Benitez Toledo Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $109,466 |
27 | Las Nubes Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $107,378 |
28 | Vaquerias Emilio Velez Inc | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $107,005 |
29 | Teodoro F Alfonzo Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $104,120 |
30 | Hacienda Toledo Ramos Inc | Moca, PR 00676 | $97,419 |
31 | Hatillo Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $96,081 |
32 | Empresas Agricolas Aulet Inc | San Juan, PR 00907 | $95,400 |
33 | Cienaga Dairy LLC | Camuy, PR 00627 | $95,244 |
34 | Delgado Peraza Dairy Farm, Inc. | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $94,587 |
35 | Las Palmas Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $93,955 |
36 | Vaqueria Grj Incorporated | Humacao, PR 00791 | $93,107 |
37 | Campo Alegre Dairy Inc | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $92,679 |
38 | Ramon Talavera Mora | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $90,707 |
39 | Ivan F Martinez Torres | Camuy, PR 00627 | $89,596 |
40 | , | $88,666 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”