Dairy Programs in Puerto Rico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 203
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $10,373,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Vaqueria Jose J Herrera Rosa Inc | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $59,551 |
62 | Ramon Ramos Vega | Isabela, PR 00662 | $59,271 |
63 | Vaqueria Rivera Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $59,135 |
64 | Benjamin Rodriguez Ramos | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $57,241 |
65 | Milk Money Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $56,557 |
66 | C & R Dairy Farm Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $56,519 |
67 | Hacienda Buenos Aires Dairy Farm Inc | Rincon, PR 00677 | $56,106 |
68 | Vaqueria Pura Brisa Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $56,102 |
69 | Felipe Vargas Nieves | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $55,799 |
70 | Brothers Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $55,416 |
71 | Rosamar Dairy Farm, Inc. | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $52,819 |
72 | Ganaderia Del Turabo Inc | Guaynabo, PR 00966 | $51,576 |
73 | Pena Pobre Farm Inc | Naguabo, PR 00718 | $51,543 |
74 | Pedro M Garcia Roman | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $51,447 |
75 | Jose M Diaz Romero | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $49,615 |
76 | Jose A Delgado Fernandez | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $48,571 |
77 | Vaqueria Delgado Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $48,483 |
78 | Isagro Inc | Aguadilla, PR 00604 | $48,420 |
79 | Jose R Aponte Figueroa | San Lorenzo, PR 00754 | $48,015 |
80 | Vaqueria La Josefina Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $47,458 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”