Dairy Programs in Puerto Rico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 203
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $10,373,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Jose M Barreto Mena | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $45,986 |
82 | Joel A Delgado Lopez | Quebradillas, PR 00678 | $45,938 |
83 | Sucesion Alfredo Toledo Gonzalez | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $45,711 |
84 | Nelson Ramos Irizarry | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $45,691 |
85 | Estancia Santa Rita LLC | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $45,399 |
86 | Jose J Rios Vega | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $44,736 |
87 | Vaqueria Perez Dorta Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $44,630 |
88 | Galimarys Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $44,191 |
89 | Barreto Romero Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $44,019 |
90 | Vaqueria Los Pinos Inc | Moca, PR 00676 | $43,926 |
91 | Barreto Dairy Inc | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $43,804 |
92 | Ever Green Dairy Farm,inc | Dorado, PR 00646 | $43,429 |
93 | Delgado Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $43,413 |
94 | Gladys A Rodriguez Rosa | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $43,165 |
95 | Vaqueria Toro Negro Inc | Moca, PR 00676 | $41,427 |
96 | Vaqueria La Amistad, Inc. | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $41,148 |
97 | Vaqueria Fernandez Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $40,799 |
98 | Vaqueria Velez Classen Corp | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $40,503 |
99 | Edgardo A Soto Avila | Quebradillas, PR 00678 | $40,365 |
100 | Ivan R Amador Torres | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $39,850 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”