Dairy Programs in Puerto Rico, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 215
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $1,151,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Vaqueria La Fe Inc | Lares, PR 00669 | $4,484 |
82 | Pedro M Garcia Roman | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $4,462 |
83 | Joel A Delgado Lopez | Quebradillas, PR 00678 | $4,425 |
84 | Vaqueria La Josefina Inc | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $4,389 |
85 | Pascasio Roman Ibarrondo | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $4,380 |
86 | , | $4,087 | |
87 | Gladys A Rodriguez Rosa | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $3,938 |
88 | Vaqueria Perez Dorta Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $3,898 |
89 | Galimarys Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $3,859 |
90 | Sucesion Alfredo Toledo Gonzalez | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $3,851 |
91 | Barreto Romero Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $3,844 |
92 | Delgado Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $3,791 |
93 | Maria E Mercado Tanon | Quebradillas, PR 00678 | $3,769 |
94 | Vaqueria Velez Classen Corp | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $3,746 |
95 | Angel R Vargas Nieves | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $3,691 |
96 | Joty Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $3,657 |
97 | Rafael A Lopez Lopez | Camuy, PR 00627 | $3,650 |
98 | Vaqueria Toro Negro Inc | Moca, PR 00676 | $3,618 |
99 | Ivan R Amador Torres | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $3,573 |
100 | Barreto Dairy Inc | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $3,544 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”