Dairy Programs in Puerto Rico, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 213
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $2,452,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jose M Talavera Rodriguez | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $17,747 |
22 | Rosa M Garcia Candelaria | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $17,183 |
23 | Agricola Ramon Rosa Delgado Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $17,165 |
24 | Jose G Toledo Toledo | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $17,047 |
25 | Hatillo Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $16,926 |
26 | Jose R Carrion | Chicago, IL 60680 | $16,857 |
27 | Jose A Torrado Perez | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $16,405 |
28 | Vaquerias Emilio Velez Inc | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $15,954 |
29 | Juan J Peraza Mora | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $15,295 |
30 | Iglesias Dairy Inc | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $14,631 |
31 | Hacienda Toledo Ramos Inc | Moca, PR 00676 | $14,233 |
32 | Empresas Agricolas Aulet Inc | San Juan, PR 00907 | $14,224 |
33 | Jorge A Machado Guzman | Camuy, PR 00627 | $14,200 |
34 | Carlos Roman Dairy Farm Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $14,119 |
35 | Delgado Peraza Dairy Farm, Inc. | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $14,103 |
36 | Las Palmas Dairy Inc | Camuy, PR 00627 | $14,008 |
37 | Luna Dairy Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $13,905 |
38 | Vaqueria Grj Incorporated | Humacao, PR 00791 | $13,882 |
39 | Campo Alegre Dairy Inc | Arecibo, PR 00612 | $13,818 |
40 | Omar A Ortega Claudio | Arecibo, PR 00614 | $13,568 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”