Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Puerto Rico, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 322
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Puerto Rico totaled $5,549,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sucn Espinosa Rivera Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $406,843 |
| 2 | Hector N Ramos Davila | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $112,244 |
| 3 | Robert G Miller Eimen | Aibonito, PR 00705 | $105,880 |
| 4 | Ricardo Velazquez Ferrer | Penuelas, PR 00624 | $103,306 |
| 5 | Rosa M Garcia Candelaria | Arecibo, PR 00613 | $98,624 |
| 6 | Rosmar Dairy Inc. | Dorado, PR 00646 | $96,678 |
| 7 | Frank M Valentin Balaguer | Anasco, PR 00610 | $92,768 |
| 8 | Hacienda Rosa Ana Inc | San Lorenzo, PR 00754 | $92,432 |
| 9 | Gustavo Toledo Toledo | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $85,979 |
| 10 | Hacienda Patricia Inc | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $83,787 |
| 11 | Vaqueria Lopez Rodriguez Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $76,497 |
| 12 | El Farmer Inc | Isabela, PR 00662 | $75,573 |
| 13 | Nestor Reyes Farm And Associates | Rio Grande, PR 00745 | $75,159 |
| 14 | Pinita Farms Inc | Yabucoa, PR 00767 | $70,450 |
| 15 | La Pica Pica Dairy Farm, Corp | San Sebastian, PR 00685 | $69,542 |
| 16 | Vaqueria Ceiba Del Mar Inc | Hatillo, PR 00659 | $67,013 |
| 17 | Luis Padilla Lozada | Corozal, PR 00783 | $66,341 |
| 18 | Jose Angel Garcia Valle | Vega Baja, PR 00694 | $61,801 |
| 19 | Ben-mald Corp | Corozal, PR 00783 | $61,398 |
| 20 | Jose A A Acevedo Perez | Moca, PR 00676 | $57,042 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf