Total Commodity Programs in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 329
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $11,089,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Elizardo Rodriguez Ruiz | Yauco, PR 00698 | $124,445 |
22 | Hacienda Lm Inc. | Salinas, PR 00751 | $114,224 |
23 | Agro Empresas La Monserrate | Lares, PR 00669 | $113,423 |
24 | Dya Del Sur | Ponce, PR 00732 | $113,411 |
25 | Wilfredo Torres Rodriguez | Yauco, PR 00698 | $110,700 |
26 | Luis E Castillo-nieves | Maricao, PR 00606 | $99,662 |
27 | Caribbean Fruit Farm Inc. | San Juan, PR 00926 | $97,995 |
28 | Finca Sur | Coamo, PR 00769 | $92,783 |
29 | William Pagan-de Jesus | Patillas, PR 00723 | $89,244 |
30 | Erk High Quality Products LLC | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $84,964 |
31 | Hacienda Costa Verde Inc | San Juan, PR 00911 | $70,377 |
32 | Mario A Soler Valcourt | Salinas, PR 00751 | $68,793 |
33 | Francisco Pena Barbosa | Patillas, PR 00723 | $64,398 |
34 | Heriberto Baez-caraballo | Yauco, PR 00698 | $61,589 |
35 | Jose M Montanez Milian | Patillas, PR 00723 | $58,859 |
36 | Wilfredo Torres-saez | Yauco, PR 00698 | $58,065 |
37 | Apiarios Caraballo Corp | Yauco, PR 00698 | $57,415 |
38 | Orlando Escalera-alamo | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $57,136 |
39 | Bienvenida Santana Ramos | Yauco, PR 00698 | $54,337 |
40 | Ramon Santiago Rivera | Villalba, PR 00766 | $53,154 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”