Total Commodity Programs in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 329
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $11,089,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Martex Farms S E | Carolina, PR 00984 | $910,643 |
2 | Finca Luciana, Inc. | Lares, PR 00669 | $884,965 |
3 | Gan Eden Farm Inc | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $517,024 |
4 | Jjj Ranch Inc | Naguabo, PR 00718 | $500,000 |
5 | Javier Enrique Velez Ruiz | Lares, PR 00669 | $475,250 |
6 | Saem Farms Inc. | Caguas, PR 00727 | $371,026 |
7 | Pablo R Reyes Pabon | Juana Diaz, PR 00795 | $261,321 |
8 | Martex Las Carolinas LLC | Salinas, PR 00751 | $253,823 |
9 | Bananera Costa Sur Inc | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $250,000 |
10 | Ms Mango Farm Inc | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $233,228 |
11 | Moises Davila Nieves | Aguirre, PR 00704 | $232,188 |
12 | Agroempresas Atabey Inc | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $217,805 |
13 | Tropical Farm Corp | Lares, PR 00669 | $182,226 |
14 | Andres Rodriguez-morejon | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $168,816 |
15 | Carlos R Ortiz Ortiz | Coamo, PR 00769 | $157,061 |
16 | Fausto Antonio Sanchez Tavera | Maricao, PR 00606 | $151,971 |
17 | Agro Tropical Inc | Gurabo, PR 00778 | $145,512 |
18 | Samuel Rivera Torres | Yauco, PR 00698 | $143,167 |
19 | Oscar Rodriguez Morejon | Santa Isabel, PR 00757 | $139,399 |
20 | Agro Supremo LLC | Patillas, PR 00723 | $131,778 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>