Farm Subsidy information

Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico

Total Subsidies in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 796

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ponce Municipio, Puerto Rico totaled $76,087,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1Martex Farms S ECarolina, PR 00984$1,900,000
2Gan Eden Farm IncSanta Isabel, PR 00757$1,897,900
3Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$1,579,812
4Juan Pagan CaraballoYauco, PR 00698$1,411,875
5Pablo R Reyes PabonJuana Diaz, PR 00795$1,291,713
6Joseph Giuliani-giorgiGuayanilla, PR 00656$1,232,300
7Fincas Luis Roig IncYauco, PR 00698$1,149,723
8Finca Luciana, Inc.Lares, PR 00669$981,977
9Mr Ricardo Giuliani-mariettiCoto Laurel, PR 00780$971,008
10Finca La Rubia IncGuayanilla, PR 00656$924,733
11Monte Fresco IncCoto Laurel, PR 00780$922,685
12Rico Banana IncCayey, PR 00736$871,664
13Carlos B Vega-belenSabana Grande, PR 00637$810,737
14Daniel Lopez-rodriguezJuana Diaz, PR 00795$744,782
15Mario A Soler-rodriguezSalinas, PR 00751$730,882
16Andres Rodriguez-morejonSanta Isabel, PR 00757$681,940
17Bananera Costa Sur IncSanta Isabel, PR 00757$672,708
18Javier Enrique Velez RuizLares, PR 00669$600,724
19Oscar Rodriguez MorejonSanta Isabel, PR 00757$557,768
20Orlando Escalera-estradaSanta Isabel, PR 00757$551,929

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag