Biomass Crop Assistance Program in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23

Recipients of Biomass Crop Assistance Program from farms in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby) totaled $3,190,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Biomass Crop Assistance Program
1995-2023
1Kennedy Forest Products IncBrantley, AL 36009$772,838
2W J Sorrell Lumber Co IncTroy, AL 36081$444,607
3Tch Inc Dba Southern Timber CompaOzark, AL 36361$425,986
4Glenwood Forest Products LLCEnterprise, AL 36330$237,099
5Charles M Money Logging Co IncAbbeville, AL 36310$187,015
6Posey Kilcrease IncBrantley, AL 36009$156,375
7Panhandle Forestry Services IncChipley, FL 32428$128,644
8Abbeville Milling IncAbbeville, AL 36310$113,813
9Findley Timber IncLapine, AL 36046$105,543
10Kennedy Land & Timber IncShorterville, AL 36373$93,150
11Coastal Plain Land And Timber LLCTroy, AL 36079$75,784
12Plum Creek Marketing IncCrossett, AR 71635$71,747
13Sellers IncRamer, AL 36069$66,433
14Dale Timber Company IncOzark, AL 36361$54,497
15Red Mountain Harvesting LLCPace, FL 32571$49,966
16H E Browder Veneer Company IncTroy, AL 36081$42,977
17Dry Creek Loggers IncElba, AL 36323$42,542
18Peacock Timber Company IncTroy, AL 36081$39,521
19Pea River Timber CompanyElba, AL 36323$30,873
20Strickland Timber LLCOzark, AL 36360$23,763

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag