Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,633

Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in 2nd District of Alabama (Rep. Martha Roby) totaled $210,417,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC)
1995-2021
1Ameris Bank **Dothan, AL 36303$6,257,832
2Shipes FarmsHeadland, AL 36345$2,486,095
3D C FarmsSamson, AL 36477$2,441,451
4Friend Bank **Slocomb, AL 36375$2,248,216
5Pitchford FarmsColumbia, AL 36319$1,907,871
6Sumblin FarmKinston, AL 36453$1,806,994
7George Jeffcoat Farms-03Gordon, AL 36343$1,746,579
8Hayes FarmsHeadland, AL 36345$1,471,675
9James C And Mary J Parker FarmsHeadland, AL 36345$1,469,660
10Alabama Ag Credit Aca **Monroeville, AL 36461$1,460,528
11Bristow Farms PartnershipColumbia, AL 36319$1,359,212
12Thomas Kirkland FarmHeadland, AL 36345$1,328,937
13Five Points Farming PartnershipCoffee Springs, AL 36318$1,290,609
14Adams Farms PartnershipNewville, AL 36353$1,259,889
15Holloman FarmColumbia, AL 36319$1,250,644
16First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$1,091,083
17Chris Thompson Farms GpMidland City, AL 36350$1,075,889
18Djl CompanyHeadland, AL 36345$1,072,273
19Averett Farm PartnershipChancellor, AL 36316$1,056,036
20Americana Community Bank **Dothan, AL 36301$976,011

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag