Farm Subsidy information
1st District of California
(Rep. Doug LaMalfa)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 558
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $24,470,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Arrowsmith & Sons Apiaries Inc. | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $2,046,142 |
2 | Juan Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $1,163,747 |
3 | Pablo Nerey | Corning, CA 96021 | $1,003,604 |
4 | North Valley Partners 3 Inc | Orland, CA 95963 | $801,877 |
5 | , | $711,862 | |
6 | Kent M Kohler | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $610,613 |
7 | Grant Leininger | Vina, CA 96092 | $383,249 |
8 | Select Harvest No 1 Lp | Chico, CA 95973 | $342,076 |
9 | Mcarthur Livestock | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $336,151 |
10 | Robert A Byrne Co | Malin, OR 97632 | $308,314 |
11 | Likely Land & Livestock | Likely, CA 96116 | $299,228 |
12 | Mendiboure Ranch | Madeline, CA 96119 | $284,404 |
13 | Lazy Spade LLC | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $283,810 |
14 | Jose Curiel Sr | Corning, CA 96021 | $261,875 |
15 | The David And Barbara Martin Trus | Los Molinos, CA 96055 | $261,875 |
16 | Lisa D. Reed | Standish, CA 96128 | $246,376 |
17 | Dusty Debraga | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $233,842 |
18 | Kramer Ranch LLC | Bieber, CA 96009 | $217,759 |
19 | Basin View Ranch LLC | Malin, OR 97632 | $217,357 |
20 | Milano Land & Cattle Company LLC | Tehachapi, CA 93561 | $208,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>