SELECT * FROM cd_mtotal WHERE fips='CA01' AND progcode='totalfarm ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Subtotal, Farming Subsidies in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,043

Recipients of Subtotal, Farming Subsidies from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $754,311,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Subtotal, Farming Subsidies
1995-2020
1R Gorrill Ranch Enterprises *Durham, CA 95938$13,143,932
2E Franklin Larrabee & Assoc *Chico, CA 95926$9,705,663
3Knight Farms *Glenn, CA 95943$7,980,260
4Resource Group *Richvale, CA 95974$6,629,447
5Southam Joint Venture *Butte City, CA 95920$6,602,013
6Tres Picos *Redding, CA 96099$6,218,759
7Perez & Perez Family Farms *Glenn, CA 95943$5,888,768
8Boeger Land Company *Gridley, CA 95948$5,764,520
9Dsl Lamalfa Family Partnership *Richvale, CA 95974$5,493,680
10Carriere & Sons *Glenn, CA 95943$5,384,636
11Meyer-baynon *Biggs, CA 95917$5,318,940
12Anderson Farming Ptshp *Chico, CA 95928$5,129,216
13Rytone Family Partnership *Chico, CA 95928$5,030,098
14Lundberg/lundberg *Richvale, CA 95974$4,952,154
15Starkey Farms *Oroville, CA 95965$4,831,010
16Sohnrey And Son Family Farm *Durham, CA 95938$4,799,443
17Larry Hansen Farms *Princeton, CA 95970$4,633,963
18Biggs Farming Group *Biggs, CA 95917$4,579,402
19A & M Farms *Chico, CA 95928$4,236,096
20Me Partnership *Durham, CA 95938$4,135,519

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag