Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 586

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $23,220,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
41Harvey RanchWeiser, ID 83672$145,466
42Crane Mills IncCorning, CA 96021$144,639
43Panhandle West, IncMalin, OR 97632$143,315
44Will J Cockrell Dba Cockrell Lc Cattle RanchCedarville, CA 96104$142,484
45Erquiaga RanchCedarville, CA 96104$140,775
46Robert StayerRed Bluff, CA 96080$128,339
47J T FarmsRed Bluff, CA 96080$124,878
48Red Barn Walnut Company, LLCLos Molinos, CA 96055$121,836
49Mendiboure RanchMadeline, CA 96119$120,206
50Rene LarranagaAlturas, CA 96101$119,347
51Novy RanchesGrenada, CA 96038$119,251
52Lindauer Farm Management IncLos Molinos, CA 96055$118,242
53Kramer Ranch LLCBieber, CA 96009$115,016
54Rumiano FarmsVina, CA 96092$114,026
55Candace OwensRed Bluff, CA 96080$111,301
56Jay S Dow JrWendel, CA 96136$109,578
57James T CockrellLake City, CA 96115$107,581
58Eagle Creek Land & Cattle LLCEagleville, CA 96110$106,927
59North Valley Partners 1Orland, CA 95963$106,168
60Je Baley OrganicMalin, OR 97632$103,122

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag