Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 586

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $23,190,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2021
1Tally Ho Farms Partnership Dba Walker BrothersMerrill, OR 97633$763,813
2Christopher DulaneyDothan, AL 36301$750,000
3Seus Family Farms IncTulelake, CA 96134$497,437
4Five Dot Land & Cattle CoStandish, CA 96128$422,485
5Mapes Ranch IncStandish, CA 96128$344,797
6Lyman Farms LLCTulelake, CA 96134$303,972
7M&s PropertiesGerber, CA 96035$294,706
8Zuppan Dairy PartnershipOrland, CA 95963$277,694
9Roger NicholsonFort Klamath, OR 97626$250,000
10Rodney R FlournoyLikely, CA 96116$250,000
11Holiday Ranches IncCottonwood, CA 96022$250,000
12Daniel A SutfinCorning, CA 96021$250,000
13A P Esteve Farms LpLodi, CA 95242$250,000
14Haleakala Ranch LLCGerber, CA 96035$250,000
15Robert A Byrne CoMalin, OR 97632$244,130
16Robert R BignamiOrland, CA 95963$231,052
17Shasta Livestock Auction Yard IncCottonwood, CA 96022$225,151
18Pamela R BignamiOrland, CA 95963$224,489
19William A SpalettaGerber, CA 96035$224,036
20Jennifer SpalettaGerber, CA 96035$223,896

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag