Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 586

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $23,220,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
141Todd StegallColusa, CA 95932$39,516
142David KingMalin, OR 97632$39,489
143Gerig Land & Livestock LLCBieber, CA 96009$39,277
144Edward L RedamontiLos Molinos, CA 96055$38,963
145Gilchrist Properties LLCLos Molinos, CA 96055$38,885
146Curt Martin Trust Dated June 2 19Corning, CA 96021$38,427
147Kelley Hot Spring Fish Inc.Canby, CA 96015$37,824
148Nelson RanchesAlturas, CA 96101$37,795
149Parks Ranch IncAdin, CA 96006$37,728
150Basin View Ranch LLCMalin, OR 97632$36,834
151Florence BordwellCedarville, CA 96104$36,494
152Shirley MurrerSusanville, CA 96130$36,224
153Franklin AndersenVina, CA 96092$36,098
154Peter N Gerig - The Gerig Family TrustBieber, CA 96009$35,862
155Tod Leininger - Aka L & L Cattle CompanyVina, CA 96092$35,785
156Oral R Choate SrEagleville, CA 96110$35,613
157George Farms IncBieber, CA 96009$35,225
158The David And Barbara Martin TrusLos Molinos, CA 96055$35,212
159Kent M KohlerRed Bluff, CA 96080$34,856
160Hagge Ranch IncAlturas, CA 96101$34,823

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag