Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 586

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $23,220,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2023
21Andersen & Sons Ranch IncVina, CA 96092$223,777
22A&m Farming LLCVina, CA 96092$218,437
23Carey Ranch LLCFort Bidwell, CA 96112$214,141
24Wright Family Farms LLCMalin, OR 97632$211,267
25Pacific Farms & Orchards IncGerber, CA 96035$199,788
263-l Organics, LLCTulelake, CA 96134$196,028
27Charles R Crain JrLos Molinos, CA 96055$192,583
28Robert Camozzi IIPetaluma, CA 94952$191,320
29Raymond AnklinAlturas, CA 96101$186,427
30Matt Anchordoguy Company LLCVina, CA 96092$184,719
31Likely Land & LivestockLikely, CA 96116$183,529
32Tehama Angus Ranch IncGerber, CA 96035$181,364
33Lazy Spade LLCRed Bluff, CA 96080$181,082
34Richard AnklinCanby, CA 96015$179,056
35Rafael HernandezTulelake, CA 96134$175,200
36Dutro Farms IncChico, CA 95973$169,301
37Long & Long Orchards IncRed Bluff, CA 96080$164,826
38Gerald G KresgeAlturas, CA 96101$160,219
39Matt NoreneCottonwood, CA 96022$152,083
40Robert L Cockrell Ranch LLCCedarville, CA 96104$149,491

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag