Farm Subsidy information
1st District of California
(Rep. Doug LaMalfa)
Total Subsidies in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,938
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 1st District of California (Rep. Doug LaMalfa) totaled $217,570,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Beaver Creek Ranch | Mcarthur, CA 96056 | $1,077,985 |
22 | Rene Larranaga | Alturas, CA 96101 | $1,077,522 |
23 | Richard Egan | Susanville, CA 96130 | $1,073,042 |
24 | Doyle Ranch Inc | Corning, CA 96021 | $1,069,841 |
25 | Darrell Wood | Vina, CA 96092 | $1,032,848 |
26 | Bill Foley & Mike Foley | Corning, CA 96021 | $1,004,341 |
27 | Elpidio Tapia | Corning, CA 96021 | $988,809 |
28 | David King | Malin, OR 97632 | $987,200 |
29 | Robert R Bignami | Orland, CA 95963 | $986,284 |
30 | Dusty Debraga | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $974,212 |
31 | John B Owens | Red Bluff, CA 96080 | $972,982 |
32 | Roberti Ranch | Loyalton, CA 96118 | $922,477 |
33 | Gerald G Kresge | Alturas, CA 96101 | $905,820 |
34 | Harvey Ranch | Weiser, ID 83672 | $878,670 |
35 | Kenneth J Wemple | Milford, CA 96121 | $866,382 |
36 | Clinton Hall | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $822,474 |
37 | Ackley Ranch LLC | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $820,688 |
38 | Huffman Brothers | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $791,075 |
39 | Ferro Family Trust | San Rafael, CA 94901 | $789,967 |
40 | Hemphill Ranch Inc | Tulelake, CA 96134 | $788,785 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”