Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 236
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $1,864,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | , | $7,387 | |
62 | Dylan T Carr | Garberville, CA 95542 | $7,309 |
63 | Kenneth A Wilson-kenneth A Wilson And Clairette W | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $7,247 |
64 | Manuel A Brazil | Petaluma, CA 94975 | $7,107 |
65 | Prior Ranch Company LLC | Hydesville, CA 95547 | $7,046 |
66 | Clint Victorine | Hydesville, CA 95547 | $7,010 |
67 | Grant D Pedrotti | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $7,005 |
68 | Bianchini Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $6,974 |
69 | James Mcisaac | Novato, CA 94947 | $6,691 |
70 | Julie Rossotti | Inverness, CA 94937 | $6,612 |
71 | Point Reyes Pastures Inc. | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $6,559 |
72 | Debra Copher | Orick, CA 95555 | $6,506 |
73 | Doug Ielmorini Dairy | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $6,483 |
74 | Sarah Gale | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $6,450 |
75 | Christie Moore | Kneeland, CA 95549 | $6,436 |
76 | , | $6,337 | |
77 | Palmer Westbrook Inc | Smith River, CA 95567 | $6,277 |
78 | Mcclure Dairy Inc | Inverness, CA 94937 | $6,053 |
79 | Karen Russ | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $5,944 |
80 | Cynthia Dolcini Dba Leroy Dolcini Ranch | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $5,880 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”