Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 252
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $7,118,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Terry Zimmerman | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $9,922 |
102 | Dwight Livestock LLC | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $9,851 |
103 | Lawrence W Bugenig | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $9,825 |
104 | Freestone Ranch | Valley Ford, Ca 94, CA 94972 | $9,152 |
105 | Mark V Moore | Kneeland, CA 95549 | $9,081 |
106 | Dolcini Bros | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $9,038 |
107 | Jeremy Fulton | Eureka, CA 95503 | $8,763 |
108 | Mcdonald Lucchesi Cattle | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $8,711 |
109 | Eaton Roughs Ranch Cattle LLC | Fortuna, CA 95540 | $8,188 |
110 | Wesley Z Moore | Bridgeville, CA 95526 | $8,169 |
111 | Aaron Michael Lloyd Dba Offshore 25 | Corte Madera, CA 94925 | $8,130 |
112 | Esther Stewart | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $8,128 |
113 | Charca Fish Viii, LLC | Mill Valley, CA 94941 | $8,015 |
114 | George Brightman | Blocksburg, CA 95514 | $7,902 |
115 | John Goldbeck | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $7,575 |
116 | Mcdonald Ranches | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $7,465 |
117 | Donald Jaunarena | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $7,248 |
118 | G B T Nunes & Co | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $6,864 |
119 | Grant D Pedrotti | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $6,680 |
120 | John Marques | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $6,678 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”