Dairy Programs in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman), 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 52
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in 2nd District of California (Rep. Jared Huffman) totaled $4,720,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mccall Dairy | Petaluma, CA 94952 | $111,903 |
22 | James M O'neil Revocable Trust - James M O'neil | Loleta, CA 95551 | $105,739 |
23 | Lucas Mccanless | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $102,276 |
24 | R & J Mcclelland Dairy | Tomales, CA 94971 | $102,051 |
25 | Double M Dairy LLC | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $95,959 |
26 | Shane F Radelfinger | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $92,357 |
27 | Tracy D Coppini | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $90,543 |
28 | Andrew J Titus | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $88,339 |
29 | Bianchini Inc | Point Reyes Station, CA 94956 | $85,372 |
30 | Riverside Dairy | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $84,922 |
31 | Regli Jersey's - James P Regli | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $81,887 |
32 | Daniel Del Biaggio | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $80,340 |
33 | Doug Ielmorini Dairy | Nicasio, CA 94946 | $69,991 |
34 | George Toste Jr | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $63,512 |
35 | Robert Tedsen | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $62,639 |
36 | Mr Jourdan Donneley Del Biaggio | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $58,791 |
37 | Thomas Ghidinelli | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $54,012 |
38 | Michael J Brazil | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $53,966 |
39 | Michael A Boynton | Ferndale, CA 95536 | $49,098 |
40 | Mark E Miranda | Loleta, CA 95551 | $47,309 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”