Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 4th District of California (Rep. Tom McClintock), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 142
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 4th District of California (Rep. Tom McClintock) totaled $5,427,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Neilsen Ranch Ptr | El Dorado, CA 95623 | $741,326 |
| 2 | Jack Sparrowk | Clements, CA 95227 | $546,854 |
| 3 | Frank Busi Jr | Jackson, CA 95642 | $265,244 |
| 4 | John K Joses | Ione, CA 95640 | $209,693 |
| 5 | Bacchi Ranch | Lotus, CA 95651 | $201,281 |
| 6 | Elliott Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $164,425 |
| 7 | John Oneto | Ione, CA 95640 | $150,925 |
| 8 | Lloyd Oneto | Ione, CA 95640 | $126,064 |
| 9 | Stan Dell Orto | Mokelumne Hill, CA 95245 | $123,059 |
| 10 | Borda Family Limited Partnership | Gardnerville, NV 89410 | $121,389 |
| 11 | Gansberg Ranch LLC | Markleeville, CA 96120 | $113,672 |
| 12 | Daniel Kuiken | Volcano, CA 95689 | $112,781 |
| 13 | Gilbert A Gianandrea | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $104,052 |
| 14 | Clinton Brownlie | Jackson, CA 95642 | $101,687 |
| 15 | Douglas H Joses | Mountain Ranch, CA 95246 | $98,423 |
| 16 | John Brownlie | Jackson, CA 95642 | $95,585 |
| 17 | Lewis Van Vleck | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $78,680 |
| 18 | Gilliland Livestock Inc | Davis, CA 95618 | $77,187 |
| 19 | John P Arditto | Plymouth, CA 95669 | $75,756 |
| 20 | William Azevedo | Galt, CA 95632 | $74,799 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
