SELECT * FROM cd_mtotal WHERE fips='CA20' AND progcode='total_cr ' AND `rank`>=1 LIMIT 0,20

Conservation Reserve Program in 20th District of California (Rep. Jimmy Panetta), 1995-2020‡

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 89

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in 20th District of California (Rep. Jimmy Panetta) totaled $4,274,000 in from 1995-2020‡.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2020
1Work Family Estate Trust *San Miguel, CA 93451$380,367
2Daniel A MaininiSan Miguel, CA 93451$341,704
3George R WorkSan Miguel, CA 93451$330,061
4Jaureguy Land Trust Dated Decembe *San Miguel, CA 93451$246,986
5Kenneth EnneyMonterey, CA 93940$200,463
6Pierre CamsuzouSan Miguel, CA 93451$166,729
7Glenna Gean MaininiSan Miguel, CA 93451$151,443
8Pete J Cagliero RtSan Miguel, CA 93451$148,823
9K L Eade Family TrustSan Ardo, CA 93450$147,915
10Portuguese Canyon Ranching Partne *San Miguel, CA 93451$132,340
11Thomas E NunnBradley, CA 93426$119,555
12Buttle Properties Revocable Trust *Bradley, CA 93426$118,807
13Leslie A CederquistSan Ardo, CA 93450$107,231
14Ray E HardenSan Miguel, CA 93451$100,381
15John O VarianParkfield, CA 93451$99,747
16Robert J Laughlin Jr Separate Pro *San Miguel, CA 93451$98,265
17Camany Family TrustLockwood, CA 93932$83,710
18Robert J Laughlin JrSan Miguel, CA 93451$78,520
19Estate Of Ardelia Work *San Miguel, CA 93451$75,920
20William L WhitneyKing City, CA 93930$75,539

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

‡ Data for 2020 includes payments made by USDA through June 30, 2020 and does not include crop insurance premium subsidies.

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag