Farm Subsidy information
3rd District of Colorado
(Rep. Scott Tipton)
Total Subsidies in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 13,130
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton) totaled $737,357,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Trevan Pepper | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $986,183 |
102 | Chiles Farms LLC | Hooper, CO 81136 | $963,144 |
103 | Whitfield Brothers Inc | Montrose, CO 81401 | $958,917 |
104 | S Lazy S Ranch | Craig, CO 81625 | $955,583 |
105 | Rio Vega Ranch LLC | Alamosa, CO 81101 | $955,066 |
106 | John D Hill | Collbran, CO 81624 | $949,339 |
107 | Raymond Dairy | Loma, CO 81524 | $947,789 |
108 | L R Smith II | Craig, CO 81625 | $946,869 |
109 | Cecil D Martin And Wanda L Martin Living Trust | Dove Creek, CO 81324 | $911,648 |
110 | Edward Coryell | Meeker, CO 81641 | $911,405 |
111 | Valdez Land & Livestock LLC | La Jara, CO 81140 | $900,821 |
112 | Matt Isgar | Hesperus, CO 81326 | $887,574 |
113 | Moeller Ranch LLC | Antonito, CO 81120 | $886,043 |
114 | Triple C Farms LLC | Sanford, CO 81151 | $884,464 |
115 | Bryan L Noland | Palisade, CO 81526 | $883,653 |
116 | Nissen Farms LLC | Mosca, CO 81146 | $880,542 |
117 | Chacon Sheep Co LLC | Loma, CO 81524 | $880,464 |
118 | Hotchkiss Ranches Inc | Hotchkiss, CO 81419 | $879,475 |
119 | Circle D Farms Inc | Monte Vista, CO 81144 | $875,443 |
120 | Kopfman Farms Inc | Center, CO 81125 | $872,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”