Livestock Forage Disaster Program in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,518

Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in 3rd District of Colorado (Rep. Scott Tipton) totaled $68,223,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Forage Disaster Program
1995-2021
1Harry Kourlis RanchEnglewood, CO 80113$681,209
2Ute Mountain TribeTowaoc, CO 81334$665,926
3Leonard Farms And Livestock LLCOlathe, CO 81425$589,221
4Etchart Livestock IncMontrose, CO 81403$576,147
5Weimer Ranches LllpNucla, CO 81424$575,630
6Mika Ag CorpWestminster, CO 80031$560,040
7Moeller Ranch LLCAntonito, CO 81120$559,388
8G L Bagwell & SonsManassa, CO 81141$542,431
9Nottingham Land & Livestock LllpCraig, CO 81626$541,962
10Frank J MenegattiWalsenburg, CO 81089$526,584
11Corey J HillSaguache, CO 81149$517,716
12Raftopoulos Brothers LivestockCraig, CO 81625$510,528
13Ute Mountain Ute Farm & Ranch EntTowaoc, CO 81334$501,200
14John B Shawcroft RanchesAlamosa, CO 81101$501,054
15Edmundson Ranches LLCWalsenburg, CO 81089$460,258
16S & T Farms LLCDel Norte, CO 81132$453,399
17Farm Services Agency **Washington, DC 20250$448,734
18Albert Camilletti & Sons IncSteamboat Springs, CO 80487$420,882
19Billy D Williams JrRye, CO 81069$403,799
20Robert W BrayRedvale, CO 81431$392,669

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag