Loan Deficiency in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 194
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in 2nd District of Connecticut (Rep. Joe Courtney) totaled $3,463,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cushman Farms Lp | North Franklin, CT 06254 | $208,535 |
| 2 | Bass Farm | Windham, CT 06280 | $147,485 |
| 3 | Fairvue Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $147,207 |
| 4 | Gluck's Dairy Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $119,541 |
| 5 | Beriah Lewis Farm Inc | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $117,176 |
| 6 | Molodich Farms Inc | Moosup, CT 06354 | $116,990 |
| 7 | Palmer Farm | North Stonington, CT 06359 | $99,488 |
| 8 | Tyler Farm LLC | Canterbury, CT 06331 | $95,817 |
| 9 | Robin A Chesmer | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $90,871 |
| 10 | Spruce Hill Farms | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $80,193 |
| 11 | Desjardins Farm | Plainfield, CT 06374 | $76,214 |
| 12 | Sherman Farms LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $63,006 |
| 13 | Fort Hill Farms LLC | Thompson, CT 06277 | $57,533 |
| 14 | Spielman Farm | Baltic, CT 06330 | $55,899 |
| 15 | Woodhill, LLC | Hampton, CT 06247 | $51,329 |
| 16 | Valleyside Farm LLC | Woodstock, CT 06281 | $50,390 |
| 17 | Steven V Snurkowski | Preston, CT 06365 | $44,740 |
| 18 | Twin Hill Farm LLC | Scotland, CT 06264 | $44,209 |
| 19 | Sunnyside Farm L L C | Voluntown, CT 06384 | $44,070 |
| 20 | Robert G Williams | Lebanon, CT 06249 | $43,336 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf