Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in 2nd District of Florida (Rep. Neal Dunn), 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 353

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in 2nd District of Florida (Rep. Neal Dunn) totaled $1,565,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
1Mark PeacockAltha, FL 32421$78,423
2Carol PeacockAltha, FL 32421$78,423
3Dietrich FarmsGraceville, FL 32440$45,560
4Thompson Brothers Angus Farm IncMarianna, FL 32448$39,883
5Greenwood Oak Farms IncGreenwood, FL 32443$32,999
6Pittman Jeff C And Ginger WBascom, FL 32423$29,937
7Larry And Carolyn BaggettMarianna, FL 32448$29,062
8Peoples South Bank **Greenwood, FL 32443$28,525
9Triple A Farms Of North Florida IncChipley, FL 32428$27,958
10Crooked Creek Farms LLCAltha, FL 32421$26,061
11First State Bank Of Blakely **Colquitt, GA 39837$23,951
122wo A Farms LLCGraceville, FL 32440$23,803
13Neil RackleyAltha, FL 32421$22,676
14Joseph H MccroneBlountstown, FL 32424$22,095
15Dietrich Farms PartnershipGraceville, FL 32440$20,829
16Lad Farms IncGreenwood, FL 32443$20,336
17Waldo R ScottJakin, GA 39861$20,053
18The Cherokee Ranch Of North FloriMarianna, FL 32448$19,738
19Ethan Davis PeacockAltha, FL 32421$19,440
20First Port City Bank **Donalsonville, GA 39845$19,242

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag