Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program in 17th District of Florida (Rep. W. Gregory Steube), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 216

Recipients of Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program from farms in 17th District of Florida (Rep. W. Gregory Steube) totaled $1,544,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program
1995-2021
1Estate Of V C Hollingsworth SrArcadia, FL 34266$63,369
2Carlos N BaileyZolfo Springs, FL 33890$59,757
3Rebecca A SmithZolfo Springs, FL 33890$43,925
4Hal PrewittBoca Raton, FL 33432$39,285
5Crews Groves IncAvon Park, FL 33826$36,580
6Edward S SchontagWauchula, FL 33873$34,922
7Watkins Citrus & Cattle CompanyAvon Park, FL 33826$34,380
8Van Adams Farms IncZolfo Springs, FL 33890$32,284
9Barben GroupAvon Park, FL 33825$27,000
10Ninfa C DavisWauchula, FL 33873$26,946
11Walter S FarrWauchula, FL 33873$26,856
12Charles J AbbottBowling Green, FL 33834$24,397
13Edgar L Davis JrWauchula, FL 33873$24,119
14V C H CitrusArcadia, FL 34266$24,116
15Peter A GoldsteinKatonah, NY 10536$21,533
16Davis Enterprises IncAvon Park, FL 33825$21,228
17Willard Kelly Durrance JrWauchula, FL 33873$20,903
18James A MessanaZolfo Springs, FL 33890$20,655
19Stevens Land & CattleZolfo Springs, FL 33890$20,172
20Ballantyne Groves IncWauchula, FL 33873$19,076

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag