Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast), 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 73

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast) totaled $3,952,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1
1995-2021
1Adams Ranch IncFort Pierce, FL 34979$749,056
2Thomas Produce Company IncBoca Raton, FL 33496$562,500
3Yee Farms IncBoynton Beach, FL 33472$404,997
4Ru-mar IncFort Pierce, FL 34945$390,936
5Best Four LLCBono, AR 72416$191,570
6Clyde D CrouchFort Pierce, FL 34945$161,889
7Tri-county Farms, LLCFort Pierce, FL 34947$132,317
8Riverside Citrus Harvesting LLCFort Pierce, FL 34954$127,507
9Diamond 3 Cattle Company LLCFort Pierce, FL 34945$101,857
10Atlantic Produce Growers LLCVero Beach, FL 32968$73,584
11Neillco Cattle LLCFort Pierce, FL 34954$64,435
12Sandscrub LLCFort Pierce, FL 34951$59,874
13Img Citrus IncVero Beach, FL 32967$58,430
14Miller Ranch & Cattle LLCFort Pierce, FL 34947$49,959
15Ralph Cain IIIPort Saint Lucie, FL 34987$42,038
16Flying L Cattle LLCLake Wales, FL 33898$36,396
17Grace Ag Consulting IncFort Pierce, FL 34979$32,612
18B & D Cattle Company LLCFort Pierce, FL 34979$32,053
19Circle I RanchPort Saint Lucie, FL 34987$30,863
20The Poor Farm LLCPort St Lucie, FL 34987$28,058

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag