Farm Subsidy information
18th District of Florida
(Rep. Brian Mast)
Total Subsidies in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast), 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 638
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast) totaled $100,018,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Daniel T Mccarty III | Fort Pierce, FL 34948 | $309,171 |
62 | Varn Citrus Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $306,556 |
63 | Gary Roberts Nursery & Landscape | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $306,205 |
64 | Rorabeck's Plants & Produce Inc | Lake Worth, FL 33463 | $306,083 |
65 | Robert Bowden | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $301,283 |
66 | Louis E Perkins | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $300,455 |
67 | Tetley Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $297,356 |
68 | Horizon Tree Farm Lc | Vero Beach, FL 32962 | $286,072 |
69 | Schumann Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $276,278 |
70 | Golden Groves | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $275,954 |
71 | Germany Hammock Groves | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $274,726 |
72 | Schirard Family LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $268,708 |
73 | Charles R Sexton Trust | Vero Beach, FL 32961 | $265,588 |
74 | Pm Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34987 | $264,876 |
75 | Little Fisch Farms LLC | Melbourne, FL 32935 | $259,404 |
76 | Atlantic Produce Growers LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $258,855 |
77 | Cassens Citrus Development Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $255,057 |
78 | P M Assoc Inc | Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33418 | $254,000 |
79 | Brothers Four Llp | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $252,623 |
80 | Story Properties | Ocoee, FL 34761 | $252,011 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”