Total Commodity Programs in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast), 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 104
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 18th District of Florida (Rep. Brian Mast) totaled $7,232,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thomas Produce Company Inc | Boca Raton, FL 33496 | $1,125,000 |
| 2 | Adams Ranch Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34979 | $998,741 |
| 3 | Yee Farms Inc | Boynton Beach, FL 33472 | $681,942 |
| 4 | Ru-mar Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $283,970 |
| 5 | Atlantic Produce Growers LLC | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $258,855 |
| 6 | Heller Bros Packing Co | Winter Garden, FL 34777 | $246,188 |
| 7 | M & V LLC | Groveland, FL 34736 | $222,680 |
| 8 | Bernard A Egan Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $220,395 |
| 9 | Best Four LLC | Bono, AR 72416 | $191,570 |
| 10 | Clyde D Crouch | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $191,407 |
| 11 | Riverside Citrus Harvesting LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $188,873 |
| 12 | Tree Planters Of South Florida In | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $179,727 |
| 13 | Hbh Groves LLC | Winter Garden, FL 34777 | $179,694 |
| 14 | Tri-county Farms, LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34947 | $141,311 |
| 15 | Horizon Palms & Nursery Inc | Port St Lucie, FL 34986 | $124,850 |
| 16 | Diamond 3 Cattle Company LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34945 | $123,999 |
| 17 | Little Fisch Farms LLC | Melbourne, FL 32935 | $113,042 |
| 18 | Miller Ranch & Cattle LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34947 | $86,988 |
| 19 | Sandscrub LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34951 | $69,153 |
| 20 | Bernard Egan & Company | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $68,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf