Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 473
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $1,056,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Walter D Andrade | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $9,760 |
22 | Pacific Floral Exchange Inc | Keaau, HI 96749 | $9,693 |
23 | Alohilani Orchids Inc | Keaau, HI 96749 | $9,298 |
24 | Kk Ranch Inc | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $9,193 |
25 | Darcy David Nobriga | Laupahoehoe, HI 96764 | $8,892 |
26 | Chun's Nursery Inc | Pukalani, HI 96788 | $8,613 |
27 | Jerry Egami | Kealakekua, HI 96750 | $8,473 |
28 | Bryan Takeshi Otani | Makawao, HI 96768 | $8,407 |
29 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $8,065 |
30 | Oby's Farm LLC | Kahului, HI 96732 | $7,956 |
31 | Kapapala Ranch | Pahala, HI 96777 | $7,712 |
32 | Hula Daddy Kona Coffee LLC | Holualoa, HI 96725 | $7,617 |
33 | Noel Escobedo Farm Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $7,419 |
34 | Y Hirayama Farm Inc | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $7,285 |
35 | Lions Gate Inc | Honaunau, HI 96726 | $6,913 |
36 | Nophadon Seechachet | Lihue, HI 96766 | $6,902 |
37 | W T Haraguchi Farm Inc | Hanalei, HI 96714 | $6,837 |
38 | Tumbaga Enterprises LLC | Makawao, HI 96768 | $6,604 |
39 | Diamond B Ranch LLC | Makawao, HI 96768 | $6,487 |
40 | Zuhair Tamimi | Paia, HI 96779 | $6,186 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”