Total Commodity Programs in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard), 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,177
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in 2nd District of Hawaii (Rep. Tulsi Gabbard) totaled $27,407,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Ponoholo Ranch Ltd | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $828,921 |
2 | Boteilho Hawaii Enterprises Inc | Hawi, HI 96719 | $478,023 |
3 | Kuahiwi Contractors Inc | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $455,612 |
4 | Kawamata Farms LLC | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $422,208 |
5 | Green Point Nurseries Inc | Hilo, HI 96720 | $366,910 |
6 | Island Harvest Inc | Kapaau, HI 96755 | $329,852 |
7 | Kahua Ranch Limited | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $326,503 |
8 | Jerry Egami | Kealakekua, HI 96750 | $314,958 |
9 | Ernest Deluz | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $284,614 |
10 | Purdyco Ltd Dba Island Princess | Honolulu, HI 96819 | $275,082 |
11 | Pacific Produce Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $272,111 |
12 | James C Sakugawa & Sons | Kula, HI 96790 | $265,231 |
13 | Howards Nurseries Inc | Kula, HI 96790 | $263,207 |
14 | Peter Schonberg | Holualoa, HI 96725 | $260,000 |
15 | Palani Ranch Company Inc | Holualoa, HI 96725 | $250,859 |
16 | William J Sanchez | Kapaa, HI 96746 | $244,257 |
17 | Kula Country Farms LLC | Kula, HI 96790 | $238,027 |
18 | Duane T Shimogawa | Lawai, HI 96765 | $236,527 |
19 | Kapapala Ranch | Pahala, HI 96777 | $236,226 |
20 | Kailani Farms LLC | Kilauea, HI 96754 | $233,458 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>